Djibouti vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Djibouti
80
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
80
in 2019
Djibouti rank
16th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
16th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Djibouti
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 80 against 80 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 16th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 80 | 50 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 44 | 80 | 36 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Djibouti or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Djibouti, at 80 against 80 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Djibouti and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Djibouti and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Djibouti ranks 16th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.