Czechia vs Japan: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Czechia
60
in 2019
Japan
60
in 2019
Czechia rank
51st
Japan rank
51st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Czechia
- Japan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 60 against 60 in Japan, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 51st and Japan ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 60 | 10 | Japan |
| 2010s | 58 | 60 | 2 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Czechia or Japan?
- Czechia, at 60 against 60 in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Czechia and Japan?
- 0, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Japan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Japan rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Czechia ranks 51st and Japan ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.