Congo vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Congo
10
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic
10
in 2019
Congo rank
157th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
157th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Congo
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Congo currently reports 10 against 10 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 157th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 157th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 | 10 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 10 | 10 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Congo or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Congo, at 10 against 10 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Congo and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 0, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Congo ranks 157th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 157th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.