Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Sudan: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
10
in 2019
Sudan
10
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
157th
Sudan rank
157th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Sudan
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 10 against 10 in Sudan, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 157th and Sudan ranks 157th of 191 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 50 | 20 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 16 | 34 | 18 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Sudan?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 10 against 10 in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Sudan?
- 0, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Sudan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Sudan rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 157th and Sudan ranks 157th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.