China vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
China
40
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
40
in 2019
China rank
108th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
108th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- China
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
China currently reports 40 against 40 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.
China ranks 108th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 108th of 191 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 | 40 | 30 | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 13 | 40 | 27 | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, China or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- China, at 40 against 40 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between China and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do China and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- China ranks 108th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 108th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.