Chile vs Malta: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Chile
60
in 2019
Malta
60
in 2019
Chile rank
51st
Malta rank
51st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Chile
- Malta
How they compare
Chile currently reports 60 against 60 in Malta, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 51st and Malta ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Chile or Malta?
- Chile, at 60 against 60 in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Chile and Malta?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malta?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Malta rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Chile ranks 51st and Malta ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.