Chile vs Republic of Korea: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Chile
60
in 2019
Republic of Korea
60
in 2019
Chile rank
51st
Republic of Korea rank
51st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Chile
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Chile currently reports 60 against 60 in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 51st and Republic of Korea ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 40 | 20 | Chile |
| 2010s | 60 | 56 | 4 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Chile or Republic of Korea?
- Chile, at 60 against 60 in Republic of Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Chile and Republic of Korea?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Republic of Korea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Republic of Korea rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Chile ranks 51st and Republic of Korea ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.