Brunei Darussalam vs Mongolia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Brunei Darussalam
80
in 2019
Mongolia
80
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
16th
Mongolia rank
16th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Mongolia
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 80 against 80 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 80 | 60 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 59 | 80 | 21 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Brunei Darussalam or Mongolia?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 80 against 80 in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Brunei Darussalam and Mongolia?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Mongolia rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.