Botswana vs Brunei Darussalam: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Botswana
80
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam
80
in 2019
Botswana rank
16th
Brunei Darussalam rank
16th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Botswana
- Brunei Darussalam
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 80 against 80 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Botswana ranks 16th and Brunei Darussalam ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Brunei Darussalam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44 | 20 | 24 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 80 | 59 | 21 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Botswana or Brunei Darussalam?
- Botswana, at 80 against 80 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Botswana and Brunei Darussalam?
- 0, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Brunei Darussalam?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Brunei Darussalam rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Botswana ranks 16th and Brunei Darussalam ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.