Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kosovo: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Bosnia and Herzegovina
60
in 2019
Kosovo
60
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
51st
Kosovo rank
51st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kosovo
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 60 against 60 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kosovo ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 51st and Kosovo ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 52 | 8 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 60 | 52 | 8 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kosovo?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 60 against 60 in Kosovo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 51st and Kosovo ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.