Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Namibia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
50
in 2019
Namibia
50
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
75th
Namibia rank
75th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Namibia
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 50 against 50 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 75th and Namibia ranks 75th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Namibia?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 50 against 50 in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Namibia?
- 0, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Namibia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Namibia rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 75th and Namibia ranks 75th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.