Australia vs Zimbabwe: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Australia
20
in 2019
Zimbabwe
20
in 2019
Australia rank
143rd
Zimbabwe rank
143rd
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Australia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Australia currently reports 20 against 20 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 20 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 20 | 20 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Australia or Zimbabwe?
- Australia, at 20 against 20 in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Australia and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Zimbabwe rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Australia ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.