Armenia vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Armenia
60
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
60
in 2019
Armenia rank
51st
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
51st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Armenia
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 60 against 60 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 51st and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 52 | 32 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 52 | 52 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Armenia or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Armenia, at 60 against 60 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Armenia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Armenia ranks 51st and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.