Armenia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Armenia
60
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina
60
in 2019
Armenia rank
51st
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
51st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Armenia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 60 against 60 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 51st and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 60 | 40 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 52 | 60 | 8 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Armenia or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Armenia, at 60 against 60 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Armenia ranks 51st and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.