Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Togo: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Togo
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Togo, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 105th and Togo ranks 105th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Togo?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Togo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Togo?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Togo?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Togo rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 105th and Togo ranks 105th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The extent of corporate transparency index measures the level of information that companies must share regarding their board members, senior executives, annual meetings and audits. This index has seven components: (i) whether Buyer must disclose direct and indirect beneficial ownership stakes representing 5%; (ii) whether Buyer must disclose information about board members’ primary employment and directorships in other companies; (iii) whether Buyer must disclose the compensation of individual managers; (iv) whether a detailed notice of general meeting must be sent 21 calendar days before the meeting; (v) whether shareholders representing 5% of Buyer’s share capital can put items on the general meeting agenda; (vi) whether Buyer’s annual financial statements must be audited by an external auditor; (vii) whether Buyer must disclose its audit reports to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.