Chile vs Niger: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index

Chile
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Niger
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
105th
Niger rank
105th

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index over time

  • Chile
  • Niger
00.511.52201320162019

How they compare

Chile currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Niger, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 105th and Niger ranks 105th of 191 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index, Chile or Niger?
Chile, at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Niger as of 2019.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index between Chile and Niger?
0 DB15-20 methodology, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Niger?
7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
How do Chile and Niger rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index?
Chile ranks 105th and Niger ranks 105th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Niger: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-corporate-transparency-index-0-7-db15-20/chile/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-corporate-transparency-index-0-7-db15-20/chile/niger/">Chile vs Niger: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The extent of corporate transparency index measures the level of information that companies must share regarding their board members, senior executives, annual meetings and audits. This index has seven components: (i) whether Buyer must disclose direct and indirect beneficial ownership stakes representing 5%; (ii) whether Buyer must disclose information about board members’ primary employment and director­ships in other companies; (iii) whether Buyer must disclose the compensation of individual managers; (iv) whether a detailed notice of general meeting must be sent 21 calendar days before the meeting; (v) whether shareholders representing 5% of Buyer’s share capital can put items on the general meeting agenda; (vi) whether Buyer’s annual financial statements must be audited by an external auditor; (vii) whether Buyer must disclose its audit reports to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.