Japan vs Mauritius: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index
Japan
71.43
in 2019
Mauritius
71.43
in 2019
Japan rank
53rd
Mauritius rank
53rd
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index over time
- Japan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Japan currently reports 71.43 against 71.43 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 53rd and Mauritius ranks 53rd of 191 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index, Japan or Mauritius?
- Japan, at 71.43 against 71.43 in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index between Japan and Mauritius?
- 0, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mauritius?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Mauritius rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index?
- Japan ranks 53rd and Mauritius ranks 53rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of corporate transparency index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.