Hong Kong, China vs United States of America: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Hong Kong, China
90
in 2019
United States of America
90
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
2nd
United States of America rank
2nd
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- United States of America
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 90 against 90 in United States of America, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 2nd and United States of America ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Hong Kong, China or United States of America?
- Hong Kong, China, at 90 against 90 in United States of America as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Hong Kong, China and United States of America?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and United States of America?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and United States of America rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 2nd and United States of America ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.