Dominican Republic vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Dominican Republic
80
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
80
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
24th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
24th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 80 against 80 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 24th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 24th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Dominican Republic or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Dominican Republic, at 80 against 80 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Dominican Republic and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 24th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 24th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.