Mongolia vs United States of America: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)

Mongolia
8 DB06-14 methodology
in 2013
United States of America
8.6 DB06-14 methodology
in 2013
Mongolia rank
12th
United States of America rank
11th

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time

  • Mongolia
  • United States of America
0246810200520092013

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 8.6 DB06-14 methodology against 8 DB06-14 methodology in Mongolia, a difference of 0.6 DB06-14 methodology.

That makes United States of America's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 12th and United States of America ranks 11th of 191 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 8 DB06-14 methodology 9 DB06-14 methodology 1 DB06-14 methodology United States of America
2010s 8 DB06-14 methodology 8.9 DB06-14 methodology 0.9 DB06-14 methodology United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Mongolia or United States of America?
United States of America, at 8.6 DB06-14 methodology against 8 DB06-14 methodology in Mongolia as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Mongolia and United States of America?
0.6 DB06-14 methodology, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and United States of America?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Mongolia and United States of America rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
Mongolia ranks 12th and United States of America ranks 11th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs United States of America: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10). Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db06-14-methodology/mongolia/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db06-14-methodology/mongolia/united-states/">Mongolia vs United States of America: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology)
Unit
DB06-14 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain cate­gories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.