Lithuania vs Peru: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Lithuania
- Peru
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 6 DB06-14 methodology against 6 DB06-14 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0 DB06-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 78th and Peru ranks 78th of 191 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 5 DB06-14 methodology | 1 DB06-14 methodology | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 5.75 DB06-14 methodology | 0.25 DB06-14 methodology | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Lithuania or Peru?
- Lithuania, at 6 DB06-14 methodology against 6 DB06-14 methodology in Peru as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Lithuania and Peru?
- 0 DB06-14 methodology, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Peru?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Lithuania and Peru rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Lithuania ranks 78th and Peru ranks 78th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.