Dominican Republic vs Grenada: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)

Dominican Republic
7 DB06-14 methodology
in 2013
Grenada
7 DB06-14 methodology
in 2013
Dominican Republic rank
44th
Grenada rank
44th

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Grenada
02468200520092013

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 7 DB06-14 methodology against 7 DB06-14 methodology in Grenada, a difference of 0 DB06-14 methodology.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Grenada ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 44th and Grenada ranks 44th of 191 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Grenada Difference Ahead
2000s 7.2 DB06-14 methodology 7 DB06-14 methodology 0.2 DB06-14 methodology Dominican Republic
2010s 7.25 DB06-14 methodology 7 DB06-14 methodology 0.25 DB06-14 methodology Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Dominican Republic or Grenada?
Dominican Republic, at 7 DB06-14 methodology against 7 DB06-14 methodology in Grenada as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Dominican Republic and Grenada?
0 DB06-14 methodology, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Grenada?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Dominican Republic and Grenada rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
Dominican Republic ranks 44th and Grenada ranks 44th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Grenada: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10). Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db06-14-methodology/dominican-republic/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db06-14-methodology/dominican-republic/grenada/">Dominican Republic vs Grenada: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology)
Unit
DB06-14 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain cate­gories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.