Taiwan, China vs Türkiye: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Taiwan, China
60
in 2013
Türkiye
60
in 2013
Taiwan, China rank
78th
Türkiye rank
78th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Taiwan, China
- Türkiye
How they compare
Taiwan, China currently reports 60 against 60 in Türkiye, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Taiwan, China ahead.
Taiwan, China ranks 78th and Türkiye ranks 78th of 191 countries.
Taiwan, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Taiwan, China | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 40 | 10 | Taiwan, China |
| 2010s | 52.5 | 45 | 7.5 | Taiwan, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Taiwan, China or Türkiye?
- Taiwan, China, at 60 against 60 in Türkiye as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Taiwan, China and Türkiye?
- 0, with Taiwan, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Taiwan, China and Türkiye?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Taiwan, China and Türkiye rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Taiwan, China ranks 78th and Türkiye ranks 78th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.