Solomon Islands vs Uruguay: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Solomon Islands
80
in 2013
Uruguay
80
in 2013
Solomon Islands rank
12th
Uruguay rank
12th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Solomon Islands
- Uruguay
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 80 against 80 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 191 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 80 | 10 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 77.5 | 80 | 2.5 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Solomon Islands or Uruguay?
- Solomon Islands, at 80 against 80 in Uruguay as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Solomon Islands and Uruguay?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Solomon Islands and Uruguay rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Solomon Islands ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.