Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Saudi Arabia
40
in 2013
Zimbabwe
40
in 2013
Saudi Arabia rank
132nd
Zimbabwe rank
132nd
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 40 against 40 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 132nd and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 191 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34 | 40 | 6 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Saudi Arabia or Zimbabwe?
- Saudi Arabia, at 40 against 40 in Zimbabwe as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 132nd and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.