Samoa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Samoa
80
in 2013
Tanzania, United Republic of
80
in 2013
Samoa rank
12th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
12th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Samoa
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 80 against 80 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Samoa ahead.
Samoa ranks 12th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 12th of 191 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 76 | 4 | Samoa |
| 2010s | 80 | 80 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Samoa or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Samoa, at 80 against 80 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Samoa and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Samoa and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Samoa ranks 12th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 12th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.