Oman vs Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Oman
20
in 2013
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
20
in 2013
Oman rank
175th
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank
175th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Oman
- Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
How they compare
Oman currently reports 20 against 20 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of has been ahead every year.
Oman ranks 175th and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 175th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 20 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 20 | 20 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Oman or Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- Oman, at 20 against 20 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Oman and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 0, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Oman and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Oman ranks 175th and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 175th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.