Namibia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Namibia
60
in 2013
Sao Tome and Principe
60
in 2013
Namibia rank
78th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
78th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Namibia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 60 against 60 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 78th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 78th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Namibia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Namibia, at 60 against 60 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Namibia ranks 78th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 78th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.