Mozambique vs Portugal: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Mozambique
70
in 2013
Portugal
70
in 2013
Mozambique rank
44th
Portugal rank
44th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Mozambique
- Portugal
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 70 against 70 in Portugal, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 44th and Portugal ranks 44th of 191 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62 | 70 | 8 | Portugal |
| 2010s | 70 | 70 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Mozambique or Portugal?
- Mozambique, at 70 against 70 in Portugal as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Mozambique and Portugal?
- 0, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Portugal?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Mozambique and Portugal rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Mozambique ranks 44th and Portugal ranks 44th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.