Mongolia vs United States of America: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Mongolia
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 86 against 80 in Mongolia, a difference of 6.
That makes United States of America's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 12th and United States of America ranks 11th of 191 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 90 | 10 | United States of America |
| 2010s | 80 | 89 | 9 | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Mongolia or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 86 against 80 in Mongolia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Mongolia and United States of America?
- 6, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and United States of America?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Mongolia and United States of America rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Mongolia ranks 12th and United States of America ranks 11th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.