Micronesia (country) vs Mongolia: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Micronesia (country)
80
in 2013
Mongolia
80
in 2013
Micronesia (country) rank
12th
Mongolia rank
12th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Mongolia
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 80 against 80 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (country) ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 80 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 80 | 80 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Micronesia (country) or Mongolia?
- Micronesia (country), at 80 against 80 in Mongolia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Micronesia (country) and Mongolia?
- 0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Mongolia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Mongolia rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.