Marshall Islands vs Papua New Guinea: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Marshall Islands
80
in 2013
Papua New Guinea
80
in 2013
Marshall Islands rank
12th
Papua New Guinea rank
12th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Marshall Islands
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 80 against 80 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 12th and Papua New Guinea ranks 12th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 80 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 80 | 80 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Marshall Islands or Papua New Guinea?
- Marshall Islands, at 80 against 80 in Papua New Guinea as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Marshall Islands and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Papua New Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Marshall Islands and Papua New Guinea rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Marshall Islands ranks 12th and Papua New Guinea ranks 12th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.