Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Libya: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
30
in 2013
Libya
30
in 2013
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
152nd
Libya rank
152nd
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Libya
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 30 against 30 in Libya, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 152nd and Libya ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38 | 20 | 18 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 30 | 25 | 5 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Libya?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 30 against 30 in Libya as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Libya?
- 0, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Libya?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Libya rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 152nd and Libya ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.