Hong Kong, China vs Mauritius: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Hong Kong, China
100
in 2013
Mauritius
100
in 2013
Hong Kong, China rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Mauritius
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 100 against 100 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Hong Kong, China or Mauritius?
- Hong Kong, China, at 100 against 100 in Mauritius as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Hong Kong, China and Mauritius?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Mauritius rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.