Grenada vs Trinidad and Tobago: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Grenada
70
in 2013
Trinidad and Tobago
70
in 2013
Grenada rank
44th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
44th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Grenada
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 70 against 70 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 44th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 44th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 70 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 70 | 70 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Grenada or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Grenada, at 70 against 70 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Grenada and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Grenada and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Grenada ranks 44th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 44th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.