Equatorial Guinea vs Haiti: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Equatorial Guinea
40
in 2013
Haiti
40
in 2013
Equatorial Guinea rank
132nd
Haiti rank
132nd
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Haiti
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 40 against 40 in Haiti, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Haiti has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 132nd and Haiti ranks 132nd of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Equatorial Guinea or Haiti?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 40 against 40 in Haiti as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Equatorial Guinea and Haiti?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Haiti?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Haiti rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 132nd and Haiti ranks 132nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.