Dominican Republic vs Grenada: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Dominican Republic
70
in 2013
Grenada
70
in 2013
Dominican Republic rank
44th
Grenada rank
44th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Grenada
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 70 against 70 in Grenada, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Grenada ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 44th and Grenada ranks 44th of 191 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72 | 70 | 2 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 72.5 | 70 | 2.5 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Dominican Republic or Grenada?
- Dominican Republic, at 70 against 70 in Grenada as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Dominican Republic and Grenada?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Grenada?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Dominican Republic and Grenada rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 44th and Grenada ranks 44th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.