Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Jordan: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
10
in 2013
Jordan
10
in 2013
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
185th
Jordan rank
185th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Jordan
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 10 against 10 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 185th and Jordan ranks 185th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 | 10 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 10 | 10 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Jordan?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 10 against 10 in Jordan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Jordan?
- 0, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Jordan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Jordan rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 185th and Jordan ranks 185th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.