Cape Verde vs Morocco: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Cape Verde
60
in 2013
Morocco
60
in 2013
Cape Verde rank
78th
Morocco rank
78th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Cape Verde
- Morocco
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 60 against 60 in Morocco, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 78th and Morocco ranks 78th of 191 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 10 | 50 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 60 | 47.5 | 12.5 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Cape Verde or Morocco?
- Cape Verde, at 60 against 60 in Morocco as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Cape Verde and Morocco?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Morocco?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Cape Verde and Morocco rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Cape Verde ranks 78th and Morocco ranks 78th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.