Belize vs Bolivia, Plurinational State of: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Belize
60
in 2013
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
60
in 2013
Belize rank
78th
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
78th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Belize
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
How they compare
Belize currently reports 60 against 60 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Bolivia, Plurinational State of has been ahead every year.
Belize ranks 78th and Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 78th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Belize or Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Belize, at 60 against 60 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Belize and Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- 0, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Belize and Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Belize ranks 78th and Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 78th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.