Bangladesh vs Malaysia: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Bangladesh
80
in 2013
Malaysia
80
in 2013
Bangladesh rank
12th
Malaysia rank
12th
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) over time
- Bangladesh
- Malaysia
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 80 against 80 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 12th and Malaysia ranks 12th of 191 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 70 | 10 | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 80 | 72.5 | 7.5 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10), Bangladesh or Malaysia?
- Bangladesh, at 80 against 80 in Malaysia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) between Bangladesh and Malaysia?
- 0, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Malaysia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Bangladesh and Malaysia rank globally for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Bangladesh ranks 12th and Malaysia ranks 12th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.