Suriname vs Timor-Leste: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Suriname
28
in 2019
Timor-Leste
28
in 2019
Suriname rank
157th
Timor-Leste rank
157th
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Suriname
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 28 against 28 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Suriname ranks 157th and Timor-Leste ranks 157th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Suriname or Timor-Leste?
- Suriname, at 28 against 28 in Timor-Leste as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Suriname and Timor-Leste?
- 0, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Timor-Leste?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Suriname and Timor-Leste rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Suriname ranks 157th and Timor-Leste ranks 157th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.