Sudan vs Tonga: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score

Sudan
30
in 2019
Tonga
30
in 2019
Sudan rank
151st
Tonga rank
151st

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Sudan
  • Tonga
0102030201320162019

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 30 against 30 in Tonga, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Tonga ahead.

Sudan ranks 151st and Tonga ranks 151st of 188 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Sudan or Tonga?
Sudan, at 30 against 30 in Tonga as of 2019.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Sudan and Tonga?
0, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Tonga?
7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
How do Sudan and Tonga rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Sudan ranks 151st and Tonga ranks 151st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,330 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.