South Africa vs United Arab Emirates: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
South Africa
80
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
80
in 2019
South Africa rank
13th
United Arab Emirates rank
13th
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- South Africa
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 80 against 80 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 13th and United Arab Emirates ranks 13th of 191 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, South Africa or United Arab Emirates?
- South Africa, at 80 against 80 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between South Africa and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and United Arab Emirates?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and United Arab Emirates rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- South Africa ranks 13th and United Arab Emirates ranks 13th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.