Saudi Arabia vs Singapore: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Saudi Arabia
86
in 2019
Singapore
86
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
3rd
Singapore rank
3rd
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Singapore
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 86 against 86 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Saudi Arabia or Singapore?
- Saudi Arabia, at 86 against 86 in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Saudi Arabia and Singapore?
- 0, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Singapore?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Singapore rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.