New Zealand vs Thailand: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
New Zealand
86
in 2019
Thailand
86
in 2019
New Zealand rank
3rd
Thailand rank
3rd
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- Thailand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 86 against 86 in Thailand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 3rd and Thailand ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, New Zealand or Thailand?
- New Zealand, at 86 against 86 in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between New Zealand and Thailand?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Thailand?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Thailand rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 3rd and Thailand ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.