New Zealand vs Singapore: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
New Zealand
86
in 2019
Singapore
86
in 2019
New Zealand rank
3rd
Singapore rank
3rd
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- Singapore
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 86 against 86 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, New Zealand or Singapore?
- New Zealand, at 86 against 86 in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between New Zealand and Singapore?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Singapore?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Singapore rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.