Myanmar vs Sao Tome and Principe: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Myanmar
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 22 against 20 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 2.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Myanmar ranks 177th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 180th of 191 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Myanmar or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Myanmar, at 22 against 20 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Myanmar and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 2, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Myanmar and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Myanmar ranks 177th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 180th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.