Malaysia vs Singapore: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Malaysia
88
in 2019
Singapore
86
in 2019
Malaysia rank
2nd
Singapore rank
3rd
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Singapore
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 88 against 86 in Singapore, a difference of 2.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Singapore ahead.
Malaysia ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 190 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Malaysia or Singapore?
- Malaysia, at 88 against 86 in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Malaysia and Singapore?
- 2, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Singapore?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Singapore rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.