Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Marshall Islands: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Lao People's Democratic Republic
20
in 2019
Marshall Islands
20
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
179th
Marshall Islands rank
179th
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 20 against 20 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 179th and Marshall Islands ranks 179th of 190 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Marshall Islands?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 20 against 20 in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Marshall Islands?
- 0, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Marshall Islands?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Marshall Islands rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 179th and Marshall Islands ranks 179th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.